Main Article Content


The purpose of this study is to test if the local government’s performance management practices are predicted by their employee’s public service motivation levels. Local governments’ performance management practices are effective when their employees are committed and motivated.  Employees whose motivations are unique to public institutions will be committed to both their key performance indicators and the general strategic goals of local governments’ core mission, and the lack of it may be detrimental to the local level management practice. The study used a cross-sectional survey of 850 local government employees in the Greater Accra of Ghana. The method of analysis of the data was multiple regression techniques. The findings suggest that employees’ scores on attraction to policymaking, civic duty, and commitment to the public interest are strongly positively associated with performance management practices. The regression analysis demonstrated that public service motivation subscales combined to predict the variance in the dependent variable. Several studies of performance management research examine utilization and the rational decision-making process in federal governments; however, this study is one of the few to examine performance management practices of local governments and public service motivation theory by showing that employees' public service motivation levels can significantly predict the changes in performance management practices.

Article Details

How to Cite
Abane , J. A., & Phinaitrup , B.-A. (2022). Performance Management Practices and Motivation in Developing Countries: A Further Validation of the Public Service Motivation Construct in Ghana. Management & Economics Research Journal, 4(1), 54-80.
Cited by


  1. Abane, J. A., & Phinaitrup, B. (2017). Performance Management as an Alternative Tool for Local Governance: Evidence from Ghanaian Local Government Sector. International Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 7(3), 188–209.
  2. Ahenkan, A., Tenakwah, E.S. & Bawole, J. N. (2018). Performance Management Implementation Challenges in Ghana’s Local Government System: Evidence from a Municipal Assembly. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(3), 519-535.
  3. Akudugu, J. A. (2013). Inducing Local Government Performance in Ghana: The Case of the District Development Facility. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(6), 1402–1417.
  4. Amirkhanyan, A. A., Kim, H. J. &, & Lambright, K. T. (2013). The performance puzzle: Understanding the factors influencing alternative dimensions and views of performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 1–34.
  5. Ammons, D N, & Rivenbark, W. C. (2008). Factors influencing the use of performance data to improve municipal services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 304–318.
  6. Ammons, David N, & Roenigk, D. J. (2015). Performance Management in Local Government: Is Practice Influenced by Doctrine? Public Performance & Management Review, 38(3), 514–541.
  7. Andersen, L. B., Heinesen, E., & HolmPedersen, L. (2014). How does public service motivation among teachers affect student performance in schools? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3).
  8. Annan-prah, E. & Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2015). Improving Productivity through Performance Management in Public Sector Organizations in Ghana: Is Change Management the Answer? Lecturer and PhD. Candidate Department of Management Studies School of Business College of Humanities and Legal Studies Univer. April 2015.
  9. Antwi, B. K. (2009). Renewing the Holy Grail of human motivation in the delivery of public service. Journal of Management Development, 28(6), 504–512.
  10. Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (2007). Managing Performance: Performance Management in action (3rd ed.). Charted Institute of Personnel & Development.
  11. Ayee, J. R. A. (2001). Civil Service Reform in Ghana: A Case Study of Contemporary Reform Problems in Africa. African Journal of Political Science, 6(1), 1–41.
  12. Baird, K., Schoch, H. & Chen, Q. J. (2012). Performance management system effectiveness in Australian local government. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(2), 161–185.
  13. Belle, N. (2013). Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153.
  14. Biron, M., Farndale, E., & Paauwe, J. (2011). Performance management effectiveness: lessons from world-leading firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(6), 1294–1311.
  15. Boyne, G. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: an evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22(2), 17–24.
  16. Bozeman, B., & Su, X. (2015). Public Service Motivation Concepts and Theory: A Critique. Public Administration Review,75(5), 700–710.
  17. Brenya, E., Adu-Gyamfi, S., Kyei, E. Y., Tariah, F. P., Nmerukini, A., Boateng, E. K. & Angmor, R. Y. (2017). Public service motivation in Ghanaian Civil Service: A case study of Ejusi-Juabebg Municipality. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(2), 164-175.
  18. Brief, A. P. & Motowildlo, S. J. M. (1986). Prosocial Organizational Behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710–725.
  19. Bullock, J. B., Stritch, J. M., & Rainey, H. G. (2015). International Comparison of Public and Private Employees’ Work Motives, Attitudes, and Perceived Rewards. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 479–489.
  20. Campbell, J. W., Lee, H., & Im, T. (2016). At the Expense of others: Altruistic helping behavior, performance management and transformational leadership. Public Management Review, 18(6).
  21. Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 243–267.
  22. Christensen, R. K., Paarlsberg, L., & Perry, J. L. (2017). Public Service Motivation Research: Lessons for Practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542.
  23. Christensen, R. K., Whiting, S. W., Im, T., Rho, E., Stritch, J. M., & Park, J. (2013). Public Service Motivation, Task, and Non-task Behavior: A Performance Appraisal Experiment with Korean MPA and MBA Students. International Public Management Journal, 16(1).
  24. Cun, X. (2012). Public service motivation and job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior. Chinese Management Studies, 6(2), 330–340.
  25. Dahling, J. J., & O’Malley, A. L. (2011). Supportive Feedback: Environments Can Mend Broken Performance Management Systems: The College of New Jersey. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4, 201–203.
  26. Dewettinck, K., & van Dijk, H. (2013). Linking Belgian employee performance management system characteristics with performance management system effectiveness: exploring the mediating role of fairness. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(4), 806–825.
  27. Dodoo, R. (1997). Performance standards and measuring performance in Ghana. Public Administration and Development, 17(1), 115–121.;2-P
  28. Favero, N., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2016). Goals, Trust, Participation, and Feedback: Linking Internal Management with Performance Outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(2).
  29. Finkelstein, M. A., Penner, L. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2005). Motive, Role Identity, and Prosocial Personality as Predictors of Volunteer Activity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 33(4), 403–418.
  30. Francois, P. (2000). Public Service Motivation’ as an Argument for Government Provision. Journal of Public Economics, 78(3), 275–299.
  31. Gabris, G. T., & Simo, G. (1995). PSM as a variable in employment decision. Public Personnel Management, 24, 33–51.
  32. George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 698–709.
  33. Gill, P. J. & Carter, S. L. (2016). Graphic Feedback, Performance Feedback, and Goal Setting Increased Staff Compliance with a Data Collection Task at a Large Residential Facility. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 36(1), 56–70.
  34. Gould-Williams, J. S., Mostafa, A. M. S., & Bottomley, P. (2015). Public service motivation and employee outcomes in the Egyptian public sector: Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2).
  35. Grant, A. M. (2008a). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.
  36. Grant, A. M. (2008b). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48–58.
  37. Grant, A. M. (2012). Leading with Meaning: Beneficiary Contact, Prosocial Impact, and the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458–476.
  38. Hair, J., Jr., Rolph, E., Anderson, Tatham, R. & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall.
  39. Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance measurement, accountability, and improved performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(4), 370–374.
  40. Hawke, L. (2012). Australian public sector performance management: success or stagnation? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 310–328.
  41. Homberg, F., & McCarthy, D. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 711–722.
  42. Hoontis, P., & Kim, T. (2012). Antecedents to Municipal Performance Measurement Implementation. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(1), 158–173.
  43. Houston, D. J. (2000). Public Service Motivation: A Multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, (4), 713–728.
  44. Jacobsen, C. B., Hvitved, J., & Andersen, L. B. (2014). Command and motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4).
  45. Kim, Y. & Kang, M. (2016). The Performance Management System of The Korean Healthcare Sector: Development, Challenges, and Future Tasks. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(1), 297–315.
  46. Kim, S. (2006). Public service motivation and organizational citizenship behavior in Korea. International Journal of Manpower, 27(8), 722–740.
  47. Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., Desmarais, C., Koumenta, M., Leisink, P., Liu, B., Palidauskaite, J., Pedersen, L. H., Perry, J. L., Ritz, A., Taylor, J., & De Vivo, P. (2012). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102.
  48. Koike, O. (2013). Institutionalizing performance management in Asia: looking East or West? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(5), 347–360.
  49. Kroll, A., & Vogel, D. (2013). The PSM-Leadership Fit: A Model of Performance Information Use. Public Administration, 92(4), 974–991.
  50. Lee, C. D. (2005). Rethinking the goals of your performance-management system. Employment Relations Today Wiley, 32(3), 53–60.
  51. Lee, G., & Choi, D. L. (2013). Does Public Service Motivation Influence the College Students’ Intention to Work in the Public Sector? Evidence from Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 145–163.
  52. Lynggaard, M., Pedersen, M. J., & Andersen, L. B. (2018). Exploring the Context Dependency of the PSM–Performance Relationship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(3).
  53. Maley, J. (2014). Sustainability: the missing element in performance management. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(3), 190–205.
  54. Mmieh, F., Mordi, C., Singh, S., & Asiedu-Appiah, F. (2011). Performance Management in Public Sector Enterprises: A Case Analysis of Employees’ Perceptions in the Electricity Company of Ghana (ECG). Journal of African Business, 12(July 2014), 419–438.
  55. Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2012). Prosocial Values and Performance Management Theory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use. Governance-an International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions, 25(3), 463–483.
  56. Moynihan, Donald P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866.
  57. Moynihan, Donald P, & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.
  58. Moynihan, Donald P. & Pandey, S.K. (2005). Why and how do state governments adopt and implement “managing for results” reforms? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 219–243.
  59. Nielsen, P. A. (2014). Learning from performance feedback: Performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities. Public Administration, 92(1).
  60. Nurkholis, Mohamad, S. H. M. &, & Ismail, S. (2014). The effect of regulation and goal orientation on performance measurement utilization: Evidence from Indonesian local governments. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 7(1), 81–105.
  61. Ohemeng, F. L. (2011). Institutionalizing the Performance Management System in Public Organizations in Ghana. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(4), 467–488.
  62. Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2009). Constraints in the Implementation of Performance Management Systems in Developing Countries: The Ghanaian Case. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 9(1), 109–132.
  63. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: a framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363–382.
  64. Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Allen & Unwin.
  65. Pandey, S. K. (2015). Performance Information Use: Making Progress but a Long Way to Go. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(1), 1–6.
  66. Penner, L. a, Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. a, & Schroeder, D. a. (2005). Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392.
  67. Perry, James L, Hondeghem, A., & Wise, L. R. (2010). Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service Motivation: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
  68. Perry, James L, & Hondeghem, A. (2008). Building Theory and Empirical Evidence about Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 3–12.
  69. Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
  70. Perry, J.L. & Wise, L. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.
  71. Piliavin, J. A. & Charng, H. W. (1990). Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 27–65.
  72. Public Services Commission. (2012). Performance Management Policy for the Public Services of Ghana.
  73. Ritz, A. (2009). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 53–78.
  74. Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.
  75. Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in ‘Modern’ Local Government. Public Administration, 79(2), 297–313.
  76. Schott, C., van Kleef, D. D., & Steen, T. (2015). What Does It Mean and Imply to be Public Service Motivated? American Review of Public Administration, 45(6), 689–707.
  77. Shahmehr, F. S., Safari, N., Jamshidi, M. J., & Yaghoobi, N.-M. (2014). The Impact of Performance Management on Mission Statement and Operational Goal Setting. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(11), 189–198.
  78. Steijn, B. (2008). Person-Environment Fit and Public Service Motivation. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 13–27.
  79. Tabachink, B. G & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education.
  80. Vandenabeele, W. (2007). Towards a Theory of Public Service Motivation: An Institutional Approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556.
  81. Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Development of a Public Service Motivation Scale: Corroboration and Extending Perry’s Measurement Instrument. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 143–167.
  82. Vandenabeele, W. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: more robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 11–34.
  83. Vandenabeele, W. (2014). Explaining Public Service Motivation: The Role of Leadership and Basic Needs Satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2).
  84. Waal, A. a. De, & Counet, H. (2009). Lessons learned from performance management systems implementations. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(4), 367–390.
  85. Wright, B. E., & Christensen, R. K. (2010). Public service motivation: A test of the job attraction-selection-attrition model. International Public Management Journal, 13(2), 155–176.
  86. Wright, B. E., Christensen, R. K., & Pandey, S. K. (2013). Measuring Public Service Motivation: Exploring the Equivalence of Existing Global Measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197–223.
  87. Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2012). Pulling the Levers: Transformational Leadership, Public Service Motivation, and Mission Valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215
  88. Yang, K. & Hsieh, J. Y. (2007). Managerial Effectiveness of Government Performance Measurement: Testing a Middle-Range Model. Public Administration Review, 861–879.