Main Article Content
Abstract
The quest for Africa's development breakthrough appears to be closely related to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The Economic Commission of Africa believes the move could solve chronic poverty and joblessness prevailing on the continent. However, the benefit of hindsight reveals limits set by the laws of thermodynamics on the extent to which economic activities can be most beneficial to humanity. The motivation to expand trade thrives on energy for extraction, production, and consumption, yielding undesirable waste products. The need for sustainable development has responded to the limits imposed by excessive waste, stretching environmental carrying capacity to the breaking point. Thus, to avoid repeating past development errors, Africa's Continental Free Trade Area needs to ascertain the extent and cost of resultant environmental damage. Clearly, AfCFTA is yet to consider such effects. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, should be a reminder of how devastating a collision between economic activity and the natural environment can be. So far, studies on AfCFTA have been restricted to quantifying the effects of tariff reductions, non-tariff barriers, and trade facilitation. This study, however, assesses the outcomes of the efforts being made to achieve the goals of AfCFTA, from an environmental economics analytical framework, in line with tenets of sustainable development. It employs data from the World Bank and AfCFTA Secretariat to analyze the welfare effects of AfCFTA through resultant deforestation, solid waste management, and climate change adaptation. The study found the resulting environmental damage to be US$ 744.71 billion, far exceeding the projected AfCFTA benefits of US$450 billion to be realized by 2035. Thus, in its current form, AfCFTA will reduce the economic welfare of Africa by at least US$294.71 billion by 2035. While in the formative stages, AfCFTA will be better served if stakeholders can pay attention to the call for a fully operational plan to offset the impending environmental damage, which cannot be taken for granted if Africa wants sustainable development.
Keywords
References
- AfCFTA (2021). African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Futures Report – Which Value Chains for a Made in Africa Revolution? AfCFTA Secretariat.
- African Development Bank (AfDB). (2019). African economic outlook 2019. ADB.
- African Development Bank (AfDB) and WWF. (2012). Africa Ecological Footprint Report: Green Infrastructure for Africa's Ecological Security. AfDB and WWF.
- African Development Bank (AfDB) and WWF. (2015). African Ecological Futures Report. AfDB and WWF.
- African Union (AU). (2020). African Trade Statistics: 2020 Yearbook. African Union Commission.
- Akeyewale, R. (2018). Who are the winners and losers in Africa's Continental free trade area? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/africa-continental-free-trade-afcfta-sme-business
- Allen, L. J. (2018). The environment and NAFTA policy debate redux: Separating rhetoric from reality. William. & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 42(3), 965–1024. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol42/iss3/7
- Amnesty International. (2011). When we sleep, we don't sleep living under the threat of forced eviction in Ghana. AFR 28/003/2011. Amnesty International Secretariat.
- Amoyaw-Osei, Y., Agyekum, O., Pwamang, J., Mueller, E., Fasko, R., & Schluep, M. (2011). Ghana e-waste country assessment. Accra. http://ewasteguide.info/files/Amoyaw-Osei_2011_GreenAd-Empa.pdf
- Ayadi, F. S., Mlanga, S., Ikpor, M. I. & Nnachi, R. A. (2019). Empirical Test of Pollution Haven Hypothesis in Nigeria Using Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3),48–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2019-0041
- Bank of England. (2019). Enhancing banks' and Insurers' approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change. Supervisory Statement SS3/19. Bank of England. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/supervisory-statement/2019/ss319
- Birdsall, N. & Wheeler, D. (1993). Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment and Development, 2(1),137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659300200107
- Chao, C. C. & Yu, E. S. H. (1997). International Capital Competition and Environmental Standards. Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1997.tb00071.x
- Chauvin, D., Nicolas, M., Ramos, P., & Porto, G. (2016). Trade, growth, and welfare impacts of the CFTA in Africa. Working Paper, International Household Survey Network. https://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/citations/78644
- Chernichiwan, J. (2017). Trade liberalization and the environment: Evidence from NAFTA and U.S. manufacturing. Journal of International Economics, 105, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.01.005
- Copeland, B. R. & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, Growth and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/.42.1.7
- Daly, H. (1993). The perils of free trade. Scientific American. 269(5), 50–57 https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1193-50
- Daum, K., Stoler, J., & Grant, R. (2017). Toward a More Sustainable Trajectory for E-Waste Policy: A Review of a Decade of E-Waste Research in Accra, Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(2), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020135
- Europol. (2011). OCTA 2011, EU organised crime threat assessment. European Police Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2813/30304
- FAO. (2012). Identifying opportunities for climate-smart agricultural investments in Africa. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/an112e/an112e00.pdf
- Francois, J., Jansen, M., & Peters, R. (2011). Trade adjustment costs and assistance: The labour market dynamics. In Jansen, M., Peters, R. and Salazar Xirinachs, J.M. (Eds.). Trade and Employment: From Myths to Facts. International Labour Office (ILO).
- Grooten, M., & Almond, R. E. A. (2018). WWF living planet report-2018: Aiming higher. Gland, Switzerland: WWF
- Harris, J. M., & Roach, B. (2018). Environmental and natural resource economics: A contemporary approach. Taylor and Francis.
- Harris, J. M. (2004). Trade and environment. Global development and environment institute. Tufts University. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620190
- Lundgren, K. (2012). The global impact of e-waste: Addressing the challenge. Programme on Safety and Health at Work and Environment. Geneva: International Labour Office (ILO).
- Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013). Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Manag, 33(5), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.006
- Liu, Y. (2018). Capital adjustment costs: Implications for domestic and export sales dynamics. University of Mannheim, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 18-04.
- Low, P. and Yeats, A. (1992). Do Dirty Industries Migrate? In Patrick Low, ed., International Trade and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Papers. World Bank.
- Ngounou, B. (2020). Africa: 34 traffickers arrested for importing electronic waste. https://www.afrik21.africa/en/africa-34-traffickers-arrested-for-importing-electronic-waste
- Oates, W. E. & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic Competition among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing? Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 333–354.
- Paarlberg, R. (2000). Political power and environmental sustainability in agriculture. In Harris, J. (Ed.), Rethinking Sustainability: Power, knowledge, and institutions. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
- Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA). (2009). The economic cost of climate change in Africa. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/12722_economiccostofclimatechangeinafrica.pdf
- Polaski, S., Anderson, S., Cavanagh, J., Gallagher, K., Pérez-Rocha, M., & Ray, R. (2020). How trade policy failed U.S. workers and how to fix it. Institute for Policy Studies, Boston University Global Development Policy Center, and Groundwork Collaborative.
- Rodrik, D. (2004). Getting institutions right. CESifo DICE Report 2/2004.
- Rothman, D., & De Bruyn, S. (1998). Probing into the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis” (Introduction to Special Issue on the Environmental Kuznets Curve). Ecological Economics, 25(2), 143–145.
- SDG Center for Africa and Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2019). Africa SDG index and dashboards report 2019. Kigali and New York: SDG Center for Africa and Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
- Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
- Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environmental Programme (SPREP) (2016). The state of Conservation in Nauru: Country Report 2013. Apia, Samoa.
- Starkey, J. L. (2006). Introduction to microeconomics: An ecological perspective. Horizon Textbook Publishing, LLC.
- Vanzetti, D., Peters, R., & Knebel, C. (2018). Non-Tariff Measures: Lifting CFTA and ACP trade to the next level. Paper presented at the UNCTAD Research Paper No. 14, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.
- World Bank. (2020a). African continental free trade area: Economic and distributional effects. World Bank.
- World Bank. (2020b). Ghana country environmental analysis. The World Bank.
- World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
- WTO-UNEP. (2009). Trade and climate change. WTO-UNEP Report. World Trade Organization.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2022 Jonathan D. Quartey
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Management & Economics Research Journal is licensed under a (CC BY-NC 4.0).
The following guidelines apply to all users:
- 1-Individuals may view, download, print, or save Journal content for research and teaching purposes.
- 2-Any use and/or copies of this journal in whole or part must include the customary bibliographic citation, including author attribution, date, article title, the Journal name, and website address.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work. Where authors include such work in an institutional repository or on their website, we request that they include a statement acknowledging the Management & Economics Research journal, including the journal's name, the volume and issue, and a web link to the journal item.
PhD.
Other articles by the same author(s)
- Jonathan D. Quartey, Wisdom D. Ametorwotia, Prosper B. Laari, Household Effective Demand for Electricity in Ghana: Analysis and Implication for Tariffs , Management & Economics Research Journal: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): September