Main Article Content

Abstract

The quest for Africa’s development breakthrough appears to be closely related to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA). The Economic Commission of Africa believes the move could solve chronic poverty and joblessness prevailing on the continent. However, the benefit of hindsight reveals limits set by the laws of thermodynamics on the extent to which economic activities can be most beneficial to humanity. The motivation to expand trade thrives on energy for extraction, production and consumption, each of which yields undesirable waste products. The need for sustainable development has been a response to the limits imposed by excessive waste, stretching environmental carrying capacity to the breaking point. Thus, in order not to repeat the development errors of the past, Africa’s Continental Free Trade Area needs to ascertain the extent and cost of resultant environmental damage. Clearly, AfCFTA is yet to consider such effects. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, should be a reminder of how devastating a collision between economic activity and the natural environment can be. Existing studies on AfCFTA have so far been restricted to quantifying the effects of tariff reductions, non-tariff barriers and trade facilitation. This study, however, assesses the outcomes of the efforts being made to achieve the goals of AfCFTA, from an environmental economics analytical framework, in line with tenets of sustainable development. It employs data mainly from the World Bank and AfCFTA Secretariat to analyze the welfare effects of AfCFTA through resultant deforestation, solid waste management and climate change adaptation. The study found the resulting environmental damage to be US$ 744.71 billion, which far exceeds the projected AfCFTA benefits of US$450 billion to be realized by 2035. Thus, in its current form, AfCFTA will reduce the economic welfare of Africa by at least US$294.71 billion by 2035. While in the formative stages, AfCFTA will be better served if stakeholders can pay attention to the call for a fully operational plan to offset the impending environmental damage, which cannot be taken for granted if Africa wants sustainable development.

Article Details

How to Cite
Quartey, J. D. (2023). Africa’s Continental Free Trade and Sustainable Development: An Economic Assessment. Management & Economics Research Journal, 5(1), 15-44. https://doi.org/10.48100/merj.2023.258
Cited by

References

  1. AfCFTA (2021). African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Futures Report – Which Value Chains for a Made in Africa Revolution? AfCFTA Secretariat.
  2. African Development Bank (AfDB). (2019). African economic outlook 2019. ADB.
  3. African Development Bank (AfDB) and WWF. (2012). Africa Ecological Footprint Report: Green Infrastructure for Africa’s Ecological Security. AfDB and WWF.
  4. African Development Bank (AfDB) and WWF. (2015). African Ecological Futures Report. AfDB and WWF.
  5. African Union (AU). (2020). African Trade Statistics: 2020 Yearbook. African Union Commission.
  6. Akeyewale, R. (2018). Who are the winners and losers in Africa’s Continental free trade area? World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/africa-continental-free-trade-afcfta-sme-business
  7. Allen, L. J. (2018). The environment and NAFTA policy debate redux: Separating rhetoric from reality. William. & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review, 42(3), 965–1024. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol42/iss3/7
  8. Amnesty International. (2011). When we sleep, we don’t sleep living under the threat of forced eviction in Ghana. AFR 28/003/2011. Amnesty International Secretariat.
  9. Amoyaw-Osei, Y., Agyekum, O., Pwamang, J., Mueller, E., Fasko, R., & Schluep, M. (2011). Ghana e-waste country assessment. Accra. http://ewasteguide.info/files/Amoyaw-Osei_2011_GreenAd-Empa.pdf
  10. Ayadi, F. S., Mlanga, S., Ikpor, M. I. & Nnachi, R. A. (2019). Empirical Test of Pollution Haven Hypothesis in Nigeria Using Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 10(3),48–58. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjss-2019-0041
  11. Bank of England. (2019). Enhancing banks’ and Insurers’ approaches to managing the financial risks from climate change. Supervisory Statement SS3/19. Bank of England. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/supervisory-statement/2019/ss319
  12. Birdsall, N. & Wheeler, D. (1993). Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where are the Pollution Havens? Journal of Environment and Development, 2(1),137–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/107049659300200107
  13. Chao, C. C. & Yu, E. S. H. (1997). International Capital Competition and Environmental Standards. Southern Economic Journal, 64(2), 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1997.tb00071.x
  14. Chauvin, D., Nicolas, M., Ramos, P., & Porto, G. (2016). Trade, growth, and welfare impacts of the CFTA in Africa. Working Paper, International Household Survey Network. https://catalog.ihsn.org/index.php/citations/78644
  15. Chernichiwan, J. (2017). Trade liberalization and the environment: Evidence from NAFTA and U.S. manufacturing. Journal of International Economics, 105, 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.01.005
  16. Copeland, B. R. & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, Growth and the Environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/.42.1.7
  17. Daly, H. (1993). The perils of free trade. Scientific American. 269(5), 50–57 https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1193-50
  18. Daum, K., Stoler, J., & Grant, R. (2017). Toward a More Sustainable Trajectory for E-Waste Policy: A Review of a Decade of E-Waste Research in Accra, Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(2), 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14020135
  19. Europol. (2011). OCTA 2011, EU organised crime threat assessment. European Police Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2813/30304
  20. FAO. (2012). Identifying opportunities for climate-smart agricultural investments in Africa. http://www.fao.org/docrep/015/an112e/an112e00.pdf
  21. Francois, J., Jansen, M., & Peters, R. (2011). Trade adjustment costs and assistance: The labour market dynamics. In Jansen, M., Peters, R. and Salazar Xirinachs, J.M. (Eds.). Trade and Employment: From Myths to Facts. International Labour Office (ILO).
  22. Grooten, M., & Almond, R. E. A. (2018). WWF living planet report-2018: Aiming higher. Gland, Switzerland: WWF
  23. Harris, J. M., & Roach, B. (2018). Environmental and natural resource economics: A contemporary approach. Taylor and Francis.
  24. Harris, J. M. (2004). Trade and environment. Global development and environment institute. Tufts University. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315620190
  25. Lundgren, K. (2012). The global impact of e-waste: Addressing the challenge. Programme on Safety and Health at Work and Environment. Geneva: International Labour Office (ILO).
  26. Kiddee, P., Naidu, R., & Wong, M. H. (2013). Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Manag, 33(5), 1237–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.01.006
  27. Liu, Y. (2018). Capital adjustment costs: Implications for domestic and export sales dynamics. University of Mannheim, Department of Economics Working Paper No. 18-04.
  28. Low, P. and Yeats, A. (1992). Do Dirty Industries Migrate? In Patrick Low, ed., International Trade and the Environment. World Bank Discussion Papers. World Bank.
  29. Ngounou, B. (2020). Africa: 34 traffickers arrested for importing electronic waste. https://www.afrik21.africa/en/africa-34-traffickers-arrested-for-importing-electronic-waste
  30. Oates, W. E. & Schwab, R. M. (1988). Economic Competition among Jurisdictions: Efficiency Enhancing or Distortion Inducing? Journal of Public Economics, 35(3), 333–354.
  31. Paarlberg, R. (2000). Political power and environmental sustainability in agriculture. In Harris, J. (Ed.), Rethinking Sustainability: Power, knowledge, and institutions. Ann Arbor, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
  32. Pan African Climate Justice Alliance (PACJA). (2009). The economic cost of climate change in Africa. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/12722_economiccostofclimatechangeinafrica.pdf
  33. Polaski, S., Anderson, S., Cavanagh, J., Gallagher, K., Pérez-Rocha, M., & Ray, R. (2020). How trade policy failed U.S. workers and how to fix it. Institute for Policy Studies, Boston University Global Development Policy Center, and Groundwork Collaborative.
  34. Rodrik, D. (2004). Getting institutions right. CESifo DICE Report 2/2004.
  35. Rothman, D., & De Bruyn, S. (1998). Probing into the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis” (Introduction to Special Issue on the Environmental Kuznets Curve). Ecological Economics, 25(2), 143–145.
  36. SDG Center for Africa and Sustainable Development Solutions Network. (2019). Africa SDG index and dashboards report 2019. Kigali and New York: SDG Center for Africa and Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
  37. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031
  38. Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environmental Programme (SPREP) (2016). The state of Conservation in Nauru: Country Report 2013. Apia, Samoa.
  39. Starkey, J. L. (2006). Introduction to microeconomics: An ecological perspective. Horizon Textbook Publishing, LLC.
  40. Vanzetti, D., Peters, R., & Knebel, C. (2018). Non-Tariff Measures: Lifting CFTA and ACP trade to the next level. Paper presented at the UNCTAD Research Paper No. 14, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Geneva.
  41. World Bank. (2020a). African continental free trade area: Economic and distributional effects. World Bank.
  42. World Bank. (2020b). Ghana country environmental analysis. The World Bank.
  43. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press.
  44. WTO-UNEP. (2009). Trade and climate change. WTO-UNEP Report. World Trade Organization.