Main Article Content
Abstract
Through this study, we will investigate the availability of quality elements in the university professor at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (University of Muhammad Khider). To achieve the study goal, we initially presented the theoretical frameworks associated with assessing the quality of the university professor from the students' students' point of view; then, we moved on to explaining the theoretical model of the research and clarifying its hypotheses. That's what allowed us to design a questionnaire containing 20 questions divided into four axes representing the dimensions of a University professor, in addition to an axis related to the personal data of the interviewee. The questionnaire was distributed to 287 students, and the study results show the availability of quality dimensions among the College of Humanities and social sciences professors. There are also differences in evaluating quality dimensions due to sex and study level.
References
- Flouh, A. (2013). Professors 'specifications from the students' point of view, (PhD thesis in Psychology and Education Sciences), University of Oran. [In Arabic]
- Al-Jabr, J. B. (2014). Evaluation of the quality of the teaching performance of faculty members in the College of Science at King Saud University from the students' point of view, Zarqa Journal for Research and Humanitarian Studies, (2) 14. [In Arabic]
- Al-Haddabi, D. A., Khan, K. O. (2008). Student evaluation of the performance of faculty members at the Yemeni University of Science and Technology in light of some teaching competencies, The Arab Journal for Quality Assurance of University Education, (2) 1, 63-74. [In Arabic]
- Nasiri, S. (2018), The importance of applying Six Sigma in improving the quality of the formative process at the university - studying a group of universities - (PhD thesis in management), University of Msila, Algeria. [In Arabic]
- Al-Jaafra, A. Y. (2015)? The effectiveness of the performance of faculty members at Zarqa University from the viewpoint of its students in light of educational quality standards, Educational Sciences Studies, (1) 2. [In Arabic]
- Jaradat, H. M. (2015). Evaluation of the Performance of Faculty Members in the Light of Quality Standards and Academic Accreditation from the Viewpoint of Students of the Mathematics Department at Salman bin Abdulaziz University, Amarabac Journal, American Arab Academy of Science and Technology, 6 (18). [In Arabic]
- Bettye, P. S. (2009). Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness for Faculty Groups Based on Race and Gender, https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ871612(16-10-2018),( 23: 20)
- Gravestock, P., & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student Course Evaluations: Research, Models and Trends, The Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario, www.heqco.ca . (14-10-2018) ,( 18: 00)
- Helen, K. et al. (2016). Student Evaluation of Faculty Physicians: Gender Differences in Teaching Evaluations, Journal Of Women’s Health, 25 .(5)
- Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2009). Development of a questionnaire for assessing students’ perceptions of the teaching and learning environment and its use in quality assurance. Learning Environments Research, 12(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-008-9050-7
- Karin, J. et al. (2018). Developing questionnaires to measure students’ expectations and perceptions of assessment quality, Sammy King Fai Hui, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1464425. (15-10-2018),( 22: 20).
- Shevlin, M. et al. (2000). The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 )4(.
- Tennant, G. & Khamis, T. (2017). Student Evaluation of Teaching: Bringing Principles into Practice, Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa, JHEA/RESA, 15 (1).
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2019 Somia Nasri, Farida Fellak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Management & Economics Research Journal is licensed under a (CC BY-NC 4.0).
The following guidelines apply to all users:
- 1-Individuals may view, download, print, or save Journal content for research and teaching purposes.
- 2-Any use and/or copies of this journal in whole or part must include the customary bibliographic citation, including author attribution, date, article title, the Journal name, and website address.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share and adapt the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work. Where authors include such work in an institutional repository or on their website, we request that they include a statement acknowledging the Management & Economics Research journal, including the journal's name, the volume and issue, and a web link to the journal item.
Assistant Professor
Contractor Professor
