Main Article Content

Abstract

The aim of this study is to clarify the contribution of technology innovation in improving the industrial companies’ competitiveness within its competitive structure. To achieve this objective and test the hypotheses, El Sewedy Cables Company (Algeria) was selected as a case study. The study used the case study approach to through the questionnaire to collect data, which was distributed to a sample of 30 members of the company’s board, and after the statistical analysis of data collected through the use of the spss, The most important result is, there is a statistically significant impact at the level of (0.05) for the technology innovation of the Al-Suwaidi Company on its competitive structure represented by (Competition in the industry, the Power of suppliers, the Power of customers, Potential of new entrants into the industry, and Threat of substitute products).


In light of these results, the study presented a number of recommendations that can guide El sewedy Company to overcome and strengthen the weaknesses in its technological innovation model and strengthen the strengths on the other hand, which helps it to improve its competitive position within the competition structure.

Keywords

Technological Innovation Product Innovation Process Innovation Competitive structure El Sewedy Cables Company (Algeria)

Article Details

Author Biography

Nacre Tahar, Hassiba Benbouali of Chlef University (Algeria)

PhD in Marketing and Management, Assistant Teacher

How to Cite
Tahar, N. (2020). Technological innovation to improve the industrial companies positioning within its competitive structure: Case study El Sewedy Cables Company (Algeria). Management & Economics Research Journal, 2(5), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.48100/merj.2020.146
Cited by

References

  1. Cherroun, R. (2014). Product innovation and the competitive advantage. European Scientific Journal, 1(1), 140-157. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/328024363.pdf
  2. Dälken, F. (2014). Are Porter’s five competitive forces still applicable? A critical examination concerning the relevance for today’s business, (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente), Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/65339/1/D%C3%A4lken_BA_MB.pdf
  3. Davenport, T. H. (1992), Process Innovation Reengineering Work through Information Technology, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Giniuniene, J., & Jurksiene, L. (2015). Dynamic Capabilities, Innovation and Organizational Learning: Interrelations and Impact on Firm Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(13), 985–991. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.515
  5. Harrell, G. D., and Frazier, G. L. (1999). Marketing, Connecting with Customers, New York: NJ Prentice hall.
  6. Johnson, M. L. L. S. F. (2014). The five competitive forces framework in a technology mediated environment: do these forces still hold in the industry of the 21st century?, (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente), Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/66196/1/Johnson_BA_MB.pdf
  7. Kanagal, N. B. (2015). Innovation and product innovation in marketing strategy. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 18, 1-25 https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/152209.pdf
  8. Khattab, S. A. (2017). The Impact of Dynamic Capability on Innovation (An Applied Study on Jordanian Pharmaceutical Organizations), European Journal of Business and Managemen, 9(20), 73-85. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/37813/38896
  9. King, W. & Kugler, J. (2000). The impact of rhetorical strategies on innovation decisions: An experimental study. Omega, 28, 485-499. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00076-6 .
  10. Li, D., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793–2799. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.007
  11. Mikkola, J. H. (2001). Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management. Technovation, 21(7), 423–435. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4972(00)00062-6
  12. Porter, M. E. (1979). The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924589
  13. Porter, M. E. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Special Issue on HBS Centennial. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 78–93.
  14. Sekaran, U. (2010). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Shane, A., & Ulrich, T .(2004). Technological Innovation, Product Development. Entrepreneurship in Management Science, 50(2), 133-14. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0204
  16. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2
  17. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656 https://www.doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
  18. Wilden, R., Gudergan, S. P., Nielsen, B. B., & Lings, I. (2013). Dynamic Capabilities and Performance: Strategy, Structure and Environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 72–96. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.12.001
  19. William J. S. (2007). Production/Operations Management (8th ed). USA: Von Hoffmann Press.