Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the factors that influencing the potential user's acceptance of Rocab mobile application for public transportation in Palestine.


This study adopts a quantitative method through 116 electronic questionnaires that developed based on innovation diffusion theory and technology acceptance model. The data were collected based on judgment sampling, which is a purposive sampling technique, meanwhile partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) analysis was conducted on data elicited from potential users using Smart-PLS analysis program.


The results showed that 66.3 percent of the variation in adoption of Rocab application can be explained by the structure model provided by this research. The results demonstrated that there is a significant effect of relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, and observability on perceived usefulness. The results also showed that the relative advantage, complexity, and observability have a significant effect on perceived ease of use, while compatibility effect on perceived ease of use was found not supported by the collected data. Additionally, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use were both significantly related to attitude, and, in turn, attitude positively influenced future usage intention to use Rocab application. Overall, it was also found 74.59 percent of the respondents are willing to use Rocab application in the future.


The originality of this research lies in investigating empirically the factors that influencing the potential user's acceptance of Rocab mobile application for public transportation in Palestine which is rare in the literature. This will benefit researchers, business community as well as policy makers.

Keywords

Innovation diffusion theory Public transportation Rocab mobile application Technology acceptance model User's acceptance

Article Details

Author Biographies

Mousa Ajouz, Palestine Polytechnic University (Palestine)

PhD, Assistant Professor
Academic profiles: Scopus

Aseel Salhab, Palestine Polytechnic University (Palestine)

Bachelor's Degree

Aseel Idais, Palestine Polytechnic University (Palestine)

Bachelor's Degree

How to Cite
Ajouz, M., Salhab, A., & Idais, A. (2020). Factors Influencing the Potential User’s Acceptance of Rocab Mobile Application for Public Transportation in Palestine: Insights from Innovation Diffusion Theory and Technology Acceptance Model. Management & Economics Research Journal, 2(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.48100/merj.vi.131
Cited by

References

  1. Ajouz, M., Abdullah, A., & Kassim, S. (2020). Acceptance of Sharīʿah-compliant precious metal-backed cryptocurrency as an alternative currency: An empirical validation of adoption of innovation theory. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22106
  2. Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011). The role of brand image, product involvement, and knowledge in explaining consumer purchase behaviour of counterfeits: Direct and indirect effects. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111095658
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). New York, USA: Psychology Press.
  4. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
  5. Cook, A. J., & Fairweather, J. R. (2007). Intentions of New Zealanders to purchase lamb or beef made using nanotechnology. British Food Journal, 109(9), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700710780670
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  7. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.3926/oss.37
  8. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-10-2018-0665
  9. Hardgrave, B. C., Davis, F. D., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (2003). Investigating determinants of software developers’ intentions to follow methodologies. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045751
  10. Harding, S., Kandlikar, M., & Gulati, S. (2016). Taxi apps, regulation, and the market for taxi journeys. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.03.009
  11. Hasan, B. (2007). Examining the effects of computer self-efficacy and system complexity on technology acceptance. Information Resources Management Journal, 20(3), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2007070106
  12. Im, H., & Ha, Y. (2011). The effect of perceptual fluency and enduring involvement on situational involvement in an online apparel shopping context. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal., 15(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021111151932
  13. Justitia, A., Semiati, R., & Ayuvinda, N. R. (2019). Customer Satisfaction Analysis of Online Taxi Mobile Apps. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 5(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.5.1.85-92
  14. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.2307/249751
  15. Kim, C., Mirusmonov, M., & Lee, I. (2010). An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.013
  16. Kim, J. (2016). An extended technology acceptance model in behavioral intention toward hotel tablet apps with moderating effects of gender and age. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(8), 1535–1553. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-06-2015-0289
  17. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, USA: Guilford Press.
  18. Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Hsu, C. N. (2011). Adding innovation diffusion theory to the technology acceptance model: Supporting employees’ intentions to use e-learning systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(4), 124–137.
  19. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4
  20. Min, S., So, K. K. F., & Jeong, M. (2019). Consumer adoption of the Uber mobile application: Insights from diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1507866
  21. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  22. Rocab. (2020). About Rocab. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from http://www.rocab.ps
  23. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, USA: The Free Press.
  24. Shen, J., Qiu, F., Li, W., & Feng, P. (2015). Exploring the Effect of the Telephone/Online Booking System on Taxi Service: Case Study of Suzhou City in China. 15th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals., 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479292.111
  25. Statista. (2020). Ridesharing services in the U.S. [Electronic resource]: Statista.
  26. Straub, D. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/248922
  27. Suhud, U., Wibowo, S., Khairi, A., & Willson, G. (2019). Applying the theory of acceptance model to consumer acceptance of taxi-hailing mobile app. Journal of Internet and E-Business Studies, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.382593
  28. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561–570. https://doi.org/10.2307/249633
  29. Van der Heijden, H. (2003). Factors influencing the usage of websites: The case of a generic portal in the Netherlands. Information & Management, 40(6), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00079-4
  30. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  31. Wan, W. N. A. A. B., Mohamad, A. F. M. F., Shahib, N. S., Azmi, A., Kamal, S. B. M., & Abdullah, D. A. (2016). Framework of customer’s intention to use Uber service in tourism destination. International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology, 2(2), 102–106.
  32. Wang, Y. S., Wu, S. C., Lin, H. H., Wang, Y. M., & He, T. R. (2012). Determinants of user adoption of web “Automatic Teller Machines”: An integrated model of ‘Transaction Cost Theory’ and ‘Innovation Diffusion Theory’. The Service Industries Journal, 32(9), 1505–1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2010.531271
  33. Weng, G. S., Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., & Hyun, S. S. (2017). Mobile taxi booking application service’s continuance usage intention by users. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.023
  34. Xiong, Y., & Zhao, G. (2016). Taxi-Hailing Apps: Negative Impacts on Taxi Driver Performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 60(1), 1957–1961. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601446
  35. Zhang, N., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2008). IDT-TAM integrated model for IT adoption. Tsinghua Science & Technology, 13(3), 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1007-0214(08)70049-x