Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the effectiveness of internal control, independent commissioners, the expertise of the board of commissioners, the number of audit committees, and the expertise of the audit committee on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2016-2018. This research is expected to be a material consideration for companies in making decisions related to taxation. The deductive approach used in this study by developing hypotheses based on relevant theories and findings of previous studies. Agency theory is used to see the effect of corporate governance on tax avoidance. The data collection method uses secondary data from the company's financial statements and annual reports according to specific criteria. Data analysis was performed by descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. The results of the regression analysis prove that effectiveness of internal control and number of audit committees had a positive effect which means higher effectiveness of internal control and number of audit committees cause more tax avoidance, conversely independent commissioners and expertise of the board of commissioners had a negative effect which shows greater independent commissioners and expertise of the board of commissioners cause less tax avoidance. Another result claim that the expertise of the audit committee did not affect on tax avoidance. In contrast to previous studies, this study is more varied by combining several independent variables.


JEL Codes: G34, H26.

Keywords

Audit Committees Board of Commissioners Internal Control

Article Details

Author Biographies

Feren Frisca Tania, Economic and Business Department, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta (Indonesia)

College Student

Mukhlasin, Economic and Business Department, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta (Indonesia)

Lecturer
Academic profiles: Scopus

How to Cite
Frisca Tania, F., & Mukhlasin. (2020). The Effect of Corporate Governance on Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Indonesia . Management & Economics Research Journal, 2(4), 66-85. https://doi.org/10.48100/merj.v2i4.126
Cited by

References

  1. Arismajayanti, N. P. A. & Jati, I. K. (2017). Influence of Audit Committee Competence, Audit Committee Independence, Independent Commissioner and Leverage on Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 5(2), 109-119.
  2. Armstrong, C. S., Blouin, J. L., Jagolinzer, A. D. & Larcker, D. F. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17.
  3. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Pertumbuhan Produksi Industri Manufaktur Triwulan III-2018. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
  4. Bimo, I. D., Prasetyo, C. Y. & Susilandari, C. A. (2019). The effect of internal control on tax avoidance: the case of Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Development, 21(2), 131–143.
  5. Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. (2010). Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(1), 41–61.
  6. Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 537–546.
  7. Deslandes, M., Fortin, A. & Landry, S. (2019). Audit committee characteristics and tax aggressiveness. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(2), 272–293.
  8. Dezoort, F.T., Hermanson, D.R., Archambeault, D.S. & Reed, S.A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38-75.
  9. Direktorat Jendral Pajak. (2016). Laporan kinerja 2016. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pajak.
  10. Direktorat Jendral Pajak. (2017). Laporan kinerja 2017. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Pajak.
  11. Direktorat Jendral Pajak. (2018). Kepatuhan dan penerimaan pajak 2017 tumbuh pesat, DJP optimis hadapi 2018. Retrieved from https://pajak.go.id/kepatuhan-dan-penerimaan-pajak-2017-tumbuh-pesat-djp-optimis-hadapi-2018
  12. Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M. & Maydew, E. L. (2010). The effects of executives on corporate tax avoidance. Accounting Review, 85(4), 1163–1189.
  13. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.
  14. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57-74.
  15. Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J. & Rego, S. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496.
  16. Gaaya, S., Lakhal, N. & Lakhal, F. (2017). Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 731–744.
  17. Godfrey, J., Hodgson, A., Tarca, A., Hamilton, J. & Holmes, S. (2010). Accounting Theory (7th Edition). Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
  18. Hsu, P. H., Moore, J. A. & Neubaum, D. O. (2018). Tax avoidance, financial experts on the audit committee, and business strategy. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 45(9–10), 1293–1321.
  19. Huang, D. F. & Chang, M. L. (2015). Do auditor-provided tax services improve the relation between tax-related internal control and book-tax differences?. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23(2), 177–199.
  20. Indayani, L. (2019). Effect of Competence of the Audit Committee and Auditors of the Big Five Public Accounting Firm on Tax Avoidance. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 86(2), 12–17.
  21. Jensen, M.C. & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial
  22. Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
  23. Jungmann, C. (2006). The Effectiveness of Corporate Governance in One-Tier and Two-Tier Board Systems – Evidence from the UK and Germany –. European Company and Financial Law Review, 3(4), 426-474.
  24. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Penerimaan pajak pusat dan SDA dari LKPP berbagai tahun (pajak daerah dari DJPK). Retrieved from http://www.djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/?p=5412
  25. Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. (2006). Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia. Jakarta: Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance.
  26. KPMG. (2014). 2014 Global Audit Committee Survey. Retrieved from https://home.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/06/tr-2014-global-audit-committee-survey.pdf
  27. Lanis, R. & Richardson, G. (2011). The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30(1), 50–70.
  28. Lanis, R. & Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: A test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75–100.
  29. Lee, R.-J. & Kao, H.-S. (2018). The Impacts of IFRSs and Auditor on Tax Avoidance. Advances in Management & Applied Economics, 8(6), 1792–7552.
  30. Lestari, N. & Wardhani, R. (2015). The effect of the tax planning to firm value with moderating board diversity. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5, 315–323.
  31. Minnick, K. & Noga, T. (2010). Do corporate governance characteristics influence tax management?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(5), 703–718.
  32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Revenue Statistics in Asian and Pacific Economies. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  33. Pratama, A. (2017). Company Characteristics, Corporate Governance and Aggressive Tax Avoidance Practice: A Study of Indonesian Companies. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 6(4), 2304–1013.
  34. Puspita, A. F., Subroto, B. & Baridwan, Z. (2016). The Analysis of Individual Behaviour of Corporate Taxpayers’ Obedience: Tax Compliance Model (Study of Hotels in Malang and Batu). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 5(3), 135-160.
  35. Rae, K., Sands, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2017). Associations among the Five Components within COSO Internal Control-Integrated Framework as the Underpinning of Quality Corporate Governance. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 28–54.
  36. Raghunandan, K. & Rama, D. V. (2007). Determinants of audit committee diligence. Accounting Horizons, 21(3), 265–279.
  37. Robinson, J. R., Xue, Y., & Zhang, M. H. (2012). Tax Planning and Financial Expertise in the Audit Committee. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–40. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2146003
  38. Rubino, M. & Vitolla, F. (2014). Internal control over financial reporting: Opportunities using the cobit framework. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(8), 736-771.
  39. Septiya, L. & Novita, S. (2018). The Impact of Ownership Structure, Independent Commissioners, Audit Committees, and Audit Quality on Tax Avoidance - An Empirical Study of Non-Financial Firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2013-2016. In Proceedings of the Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study, 1, 515–521. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007017605150521
  40. Shin, I. & Park, S. (2019). The relation between product market competition and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Korea. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16(2), 313–325.
  41. Tandean, V. A. & Winnie, W. (2016). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Tax Avoidance. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-2016-01-01-B004
  42. Tjondro, E. & Olivia, V. (2018). Role of Audit Committee in Tax Avoidance of Family and Non-Family Firms: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Business, 1(3), 368–380.
  43. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53(1), 113–142.
  44. Wu, J., Habib, A., & Weil, S. (2012). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the audit committee literature. Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 8(1), 15-31.